![]() In the above example, CSS HTML Validator generates a message about an inappropriate document title. Examplesīelow are examples of why CSS HTML Validator is a better way to check your web documents. If you're concerned about search engine rankings (and you probably are), then you'll be glad to know that CSS HTML Validator also checks for SEO issues. In addition to all of the above, CSS HTML Validator also checks CSS, links, and spelling. Also, CSS HTML Validator Home (and above) include a legacy DTD based validator for when you'd like to use one (choose ' Validate > Nsgmls message only'). If you do wish to adhere to the standards as closely and strictly as possible, then CSS HTML Validator will help you do that as well, with its "standards compliant check" (choose ' Validate > Standards compliant check'). CSS HTML Validator can find many more problems or potential problems than other syntax checkers and validators can find. Instead of not generating errors for bad attribute values, it reports them. Instead of generating errors for issues that are fine in the real-world, CSS HTML Validator understands them. As such, it is not limited to adhering to strict HTML specifications. CSS HTML Validator is a "Real-Life" ValidatorĬSS HTML Validator is designed to be a "real-life" validator. Fortunately, most validators have now moved to this more practical approach due to HTML5. It takes a more practical approach like CSS HTML Validator has always done. These methods of checking for problems do not reflect upon real-life situations.Īlso, HTML5, the latest HTML standard, does not use DTD based validation at all. They also consider bad attribute values that don't work in popular browsers to actually be valid (like width="really wide" for the img element). These validators are only concerned about strict adherence to what can only be described in the specification's DTD.įurthermore, DTD based validators consider many practical features supported by popular browsers to be invalid. Why Do Other Validators Miss These Issues?Ī DTD validator like the W3C validator and other validators claiming to be based on real SGML parsers, are technically incapable of finding certain problems because they are limited in the number of problems that they can check for. We don't consider a page with so many problems "interoperable", and neither should you. Validate the test document using the W3C HTML Validator and see how many problems it misses.Įven with all these issues, the W3C validator says that you may want to place an icon on your page to show your readers that you've taken the care to create an "interoperable" web page. ![]() CSS HTML Validator has many features that allow a developer to customize the results based on his or her needs. ![]() ![]() * The exact number of errors and warnings generated depend on the current settings of CSS HTML Validator. Number of Problems Found in the Test Document Validator/Checkerįinds NO problems, approves the test document as valid HTML,Īnd calls it "interoperable" (last tested ) More/Search Why is CSS HTML Validator Better?īelow you will find a table and HTML examples that show CSS HTML Validator finding problems and potential issues that other syntax checkers and validators (such as the popular W3C HTML Validator) cannot find.Īlso, don't forget that CSS HTML Validator protects your privacy because your documents are not uploaded to the web in order to check them. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |